Govt decides against badger cull

News in from the beeb, the government has decided against a cull of badgers in England to control TB in cattle. The policy announcement, which was due to be made next Monday, goes against the recommendations of the former Chief Scientific Adviser, Sir David King.

NFU president, Peter Kendell, told BBC News that Westminster had “ducked the issue” and that the NFU would be organising a protest outside parliament next week. He added that farmers in England would be “devastated” by the decision. Some 4,000 herds were affected with TB in 2007, mainly in the south west of England, which was up nearly 18% on the previous year.

Ministers however have instead accepted the scientific arguments of the Independent Scientific Group on TB in Cattle.

The ISG’s analysis – an earlier and much larger study than Sir David’s – concluded that culling badgers would not be economic. The ISG’s analysis showed that sustained culling over a large area for five or six years might have some effect, “but even that is not clear cut”, according to Lord Krebs.

He said: “It’s not practical to carry out that kind of scorched-earth cull over a prolonged period for a policy that may not even work.” According to Lord Krebs, the incidence of TB in cattle is increasing very slowly, and he believes that the disease could be bought under control through better surveillance and biosecurity.

The announcement is sure to be welcomed by badger groups, who have fought a campaign against a mass cull.

This entry was posted in Disease, Economics, Food & Agriculture, Nature & Conservation, Politics & Policy initiatives, Rural communities, UK and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Govt decides against badger cull

  1. Pete Smith says:

    Great news, if somewhat surprising. The more upset the NFU get about this the happier I’ll be. Maybe they’ll manage their herds’ health better now they can’t use wildlife as a scapegoat.
    The only thing that worries me is the possible growth in illegal culling, especially gassing.

  2. matt says:

    Yes, I think you’re right about the need for farmers to manage their herds better, although it can be difficult for them to do this. Vaccination surely is an option. It is surprising news.

  3. the Grit says:

    Hi y’all,

    This is another example of why I like your blog so much. Over here, in any modest cattle operation, every animal is tagged, numbered, and recorded in some computer database, which also includes their monthly weight, vaccinations, what and how much feed additive they were given, and, best I can tell, how well their personal astrological advisor predicted their future. The point being that, with all this information available, we can pretty much pinpoint the source of infections. Of course, our Government continues to ignore this abundance of information when making rulings in this area. Go figure.

    the Grit

  4. earthpal says:

    The farmers are threatening legal action against the government’s surprise decision to listen to the facts and not authorise a cull:

  5. Pete Smith says:

    No surprises there. It’ll be an interesting case.

  6. the Grit says:

    Hi ep,

    Your Government takes facts into consideration? Well, there’s the problem.

    the Grit

Comments are closed.